Back to School with Common Core
One evening at a Mexican restaurant in Poulsbo, I picked up a copy of some Spanish language newspaper (La Raza?). I always feel that eating in a Mexican restaurant is more meaningful if you browse through the latest news on inmigración or fútbol while munching on your chips y salsa. This was towards the end of August, so the start of school was just around the corner. Appropriately enough, the periódico had a headliner about Los Estándares Académicos—the Common Core State Standards. Let’s call them the EAs from now on.
These have been looming on the horizon for some time, creating a mixture of anticipation and dread. I don’t encounter too many people that express a genuine excitement about them, although it seems the younger teachers are more accepting of and, sometimes, enthusiastic about them. We older teachers, battle-weary after decades of standards writing, revising, word-smithing, aligning, spiraling, assessment writing, and testing are a little less eager to face yet another revolutionary program.
Some people, not necessarily educators, seem to view the oncoming CC with actual fear. To test this, I did an internet search (using Bing for a change) on “Common Core State Standards” and got a whopping 151 million results. I then followed it up with a search adding the word “criticisms.” This resulted in almost 41 million results, some with titles like “The War Against Common Core” raising fears that there’s a conspiracy afoot. And fear seems to be at the root of the reactionary voices: fear of losing a sense of control in a local school system, a fear of lowering standards, or a fear of government-imposed ideologies. Bueno, since this blog is NOT about politics, or even public education per se, I would suggest reading this article from the National Review which, from a right-of-center perspective, nicely sums up the CC issue and hopefully allays some fears.
The Spanish article summed it up quite succinctly. It first stated what the EAs are: puntos de referencia para medir el conocimiento y la capacidad de los estudiantes durante cada año escolar. It then pointed out the justification for them, referring to the fact that different states have different academic standards, kids with a calificación of a “C” in one state, could possibly earn an “A” in another. But I was more interested in the graphics illustrating the article.
Delivering all the positive messages of the EAs was a brightly smiling female cartoon character of the “big-head-little-body” type. She was sort of fairy godmother of public education, wielding her pointer like a magic wand. Her word balloons were in Spanish, but her extremadamente dark hue and straight hair made her hard to pinpoint ethnically. Her pearl necklace and dress-suit definitely gave her a professional air. But what I was most impressed with was the decision of the cartoonist to give her a modest physique, wider in the waistline than your typical female cartoon. She’s not Twiggy or Barbie. She’s a slightly chunky, ethnically ambiguous lady. No chicas will suffer anorexia by comparing themselves to her, and no particular groups can be insulted by her. That’s an education in itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment